What is possible?

Rochdale’s plans mainly mean loss: fewer affordable homes, loss of green space, and the destruction of a close-knit neighborhood.
But there are alternatives that match residents’ wishes and the city’s needs much better.

1. Renovation instead of demolition

Our complex can stay standing. Many homes have been improved by residents over the years.
Other homes need maintenance, but that can be solved with targeted renovation and repairs:

• Fixing damp spots or ventilation problems.
• Energy-efficient upgrades (insulation, new windows, solar panels).
• Residents keep their homes and their rights.
• No years of uncertainty or forced relocation.

Example: On Akbarstraat in Bos en Lommer, Rochdale itself chose renovation while keeping the homes. Why not here?

2. New construction on vacant land

If there really is a need for new housing, build where there is still space.
Demolishing 220 existing homes will only deliver extra housing after years – and until then, the housing crisis will only get worse.

There’s a suitable site nearby:

• The land between the railway and the Majoor Fransweg (Project Eureka).
• It’s already construction-ready, without demolishing any homes.
• With smart design, a park-like residential area can be created there, while keeping the trees along the railway.

3. Real gains for the city

With these alternatives, Amsterdam achieves much more:

• Preservation of affordable housing for current residents.
• Extra homes on new sites, instead of losses.
• Preservation of green space and livability in Bos en Lommer.
• Trust between residents and the municipality/housing corporations.

Conclusion

We say: stop demolition, choose preservation and expansion.
Renovation and new construction on vacant land are realistic, better alternatives.

👉 Read more about what’s wrong with the current plan or support our campaign via Join us.